My personal portfolio, GitHub projects, and blog posts.
by
We’ve all been there: typing an increasingly elaborate prompt into an AI, hoping it will connect the dots, research the facts, and then synthesize them perfectly. Sometimes it works like magic. Other times, it feels like shouting into the void, leaving us with partial answers, hallucinated facts, or just plain confusion.
The fundamental challenge is that Large Language Models (LLMs) are, at their core, probabilistic. They predict the next token based on patterns. While powerful, this makes orchestrating complex, multi-step, reliable AI workflows incredibly difficult. We need something more… declarative. Something more structured.
What if we could move beyond “just asking” and start programming the flow of thought itself?
Imagine a world where you don’t just prompt an LLM; you query a reasoning engine using a standardized, declarative syntax. This isn’t about retrieving static data from a database; it’s about orchestrating dynamic intelligence. I call this AQL: Agentic Query Language.
Think of it as SQL for the era of AI Agents.
In traditional SQL, your database is made up of tables, rows, and columns of structured data. In AQL, your “database” is a dynamic network of specialized AI agents.
Research_Agent: Capable of deep web searches, source credibility analysis, and synthesizing information.Coder_Agent: Skilled in various programming languages, unit testing, and code optimization.Creative_Writer_Agent: Focused on generating engaging content in various styles and tones.Security_Auditor_Agent: Designed to identify vulnerabilities and ensure compliance.Each agent isn’t just a blob of intelligence; it exposes “columns” representing its capabilities, internal states, or output parameters (e.g., [search_depth], [language_stack], [word_count], [vulnerability_scan]).
SELECT: Defining the Desired OutcomeThe [SELECT] clause in AQL is more than just picking data points; it’s defining the nature of the intelligence you want returned.
SELECT summary,
confidence_score,
source_citations
FROM Global_Market_Agent
WHERE topic = 'Quantum Computing'
AND depth = 'technical';
This query asks a [Global_Market_Agent] not just for a summary, but for an assessment of its confidence and the sources backing its claims, all specifically for a technical deep dive into quantum computing.
JOIN: Multi-Agent Collaboration at Its FinestThis is where AQL truly shines. A [JOIN] isn’t merely merging data rows; it represents a collaborative handoff and iterative refinement between distinct intelligences.
SELECT code_snippet
FROM Developer_Agent
JOIN Security_Auditor_Agent
ON Developer_Agent.output = Security_Auditor_Agent.input
WHERE vulnerability_scan = 'passed'
AND optimization_level = 'high';
Here, a [Developer_Agent] generates code, which is then passed as input to a [Security_Auditor_Agent]. The [JOIN] implies a loop: the developer produces code, the auditor checks it, and this cycle continues until the code passes the vulnerability scan and meets the optimization criteria.
This concept opens the door to incredibly powerful and intuitive ways to interact with AI.
PROMPT BY Clause (Replacing GROUP BY)Instead of grouping data, we [PROMPT BY] a specific persona, style, or constraint for the agent.
SELECT analysis
FROM Financial_Agent
PROMPT BY 'aggressive investor persona'
WHERE market_sector = 'Renewables';
This tells the [Financial_Agent] to not just analyze, but to frame its analysis from a specific perspective.
LATENT JOIN: Merging Hard Data with IntuitionImagine combining the precision of structured data with the nuanced “feelings” or insights of an AI agent’s latent space.
SELECT sales_data.revenue,
Trend_Agent.market_sentiment
FROM sales_data
LATENT JOIN Trend_Agent
ON sales_data.region = Trend_Agent.observed_region;
This query attempts to blend hard sales figures with the [Trend_Agent]’s “intuition” or learned market sentiment for specific regions, providing a richer, more holistic understanding.
HAVING Guardrail: Ensuring Safety and EthicsThe [HAVING] clause, traditionally for filtering grouped results, could act as a crucial safety and ethics filter in AQL.
SELECT response
FROM Chat_Agent
WHERE user_query = 'Explain current geopolitical tensions'
HAVING toxicity < 0.05
AND fact_check_score > 0.9;
This ensures that the [Chat_Agent]’s response is not only relevant but also adheres to predefined safety and factual accuracy thresholds.
1. Deterministic Control over Probabilistic Models
AQL offers a structured, declarative way to impose logical flow and constraints on inherently probabilistic AI systems, leading to more predictable and reliable outcomes.
2. Auditability and Debugging
Every “query” represents an auditable trail. You can trace exactly which agents were involved, what their inputs and outputs were, and how the final result was derived, making debugging complex AI workflows significantly easier.
3. Optimized Resource Allocation
Just as SQL query optimizers find the most efficient way to retrieve data, an AQL engine could optimize the “reasoning path,” selecting the most cost-effective or token-efficient agents for a given task.
4. Complex Workflow Design
AQL enables the creation of highly sophisticated, multi-agent workflows that would be cumbersome or impossible with simple prompting alone.
The shift from simple prompting to an Agentic Query Language represents a monumental leap in how we interact with and build upon AI. It moves us away from vague instructions and towards a powerful, structured paradigm for orchestrating intelligent systems.
We’re not just asking questions anymore; we’re composing intelligence.
What are your thoughts on AQL? How do you see yourself “querying” AI agents in the future? Share your ideas on LinkedIn or X/Twitter.
tags: